Self-paced AI courses are widely available, but their effectiveness remains questionable. Despite the accessibility of these courses, completion rates are relatively low, and the practical application of learned concepts is even more miniscule. Organizations that rely solely on passive learning often fail to see a tangible business impact. It was found by MIT Sloan Management Review that when organizations prioritize continuous learning, they experience a 30% higher success rate in AI adoption compared to organizations that deprioritize training after employees complete an initial learning course. When learning is not a foundational pillar within companies, they fail to capitalize on employee creativity, and fall behind on innovation initiatives.
LEARN MORE: Why Most Teams Never Advance Beyond Basic Data Skills—And How to Fix It
Low completion rates often reaffirm the belief that there is a recognized challenge when it comes to employees completing online training – making it unlikely that they’ll retain or apply any valuable knowledge from the course.
One major drawback of self-paced learning is the absence of real-time feedback. AI is a complex field that requires hands-on problem-solving, yet without an instructor or mentor to guide employees through these new and uncharted scenarios, frustration and disengagement can tend to increase among learners.
Many self-paced AI courses take a broad approach, covering theoretical concepts without aligning them to specific job functions. Employees struggle to see the relevance of what they’re learning, leading to poor engagement and minimal application of AI in their actual roles.
Combining self-paced learning with live instruction enables employees to ask questions, receive clarification, and participate in brainstorming sessions and discussions with peers. This interaction significantly enhances comprehension and engagement.
Hands-on learning through interactive projects allows employees to apply AI concepts in real-world scenarios. The Training Industry found that learners who participated in interactive settings retain up to 75% more than learners obtaining information in passive ways (i.e. pre-recorded videos). This is why an interactive approach is more suitable to retain knowledge retention and develop skills to apply concepts in practical scenarios.
MUST READ: Why In-Person Training Outperforms Online Methods in Corporate Learning
Instead of generic AI applications, training should incorporate case studies specific to an organization’s industry and challenges. Employees who see direct relevance to their work are more likely to integrate AI solutions effectively.
Organizations need structured, interactive training that aligns with business objectives to maximize the impact of AI learning. At Data Society, our AI training programs provide live instruction, real-world projects, and industry-specific case studies to ensure employees complete their training and apply AI effectively in their roles.
Let’s transform AI learning from passive consumption to active innovation. Contact us today to learn how we can elevate your team's AI skills and drive real business outcomes.
Subscribe to get the latest updates from Data Society, including tips for how to use your data better, real-life examples of leveraging analytics, and more.
